#Trainerroad zwift update#

There is nothing smart about them based on your own strengths / weaknesses or training volume. Now, obviously I don’t work there, and I may be completely misreading things. One of the biggest issues with the Zwift plans is you need to basically do them exactly when Zwift says, with very little flexibility. I don’t have faith that Zwift can integrate the programs on a software level without a lot of difficulty. I don’t know how well Zwift might integrate TR’s people into the organization. I would assume it needs constant monitoring and improvement, and using a very specialized skillset to boot. The adaptive training algorithm isn’t a simple algorithm, as I understand it. What does this have to do with a potential TrainerRoad acquisition? Even though I don’t have a TR subscription now, I would be concerned if Zwift acquired TR and moved to integrate its assets because of the complexity and technical debt in its existing code. Simply put, indoor speed readings can be misleading and don't really add any value to the workout. The 'speeds' riders achieve indoors are often not representative of speeds they'd be going outdoors at equivalent power levels. Or you know how Zwiftpower had a whole bunch of hiccups when Zwift integrated it? Or how it hasn’t been truly integrated in that you still have to sign up for an account separately? TrainerRoad currently doesn't display speed readings during Power or VirtualPower-based workouts.

#Trainerroad zwift update#

You know all the bugs that keep coming up every time a new client update is launched, or that haven’t been fixed? The bugs are a sign that the code is complex and that maybe too many problems have had easy fixes rather than more fundamental ones (i.e.